mrkr, compared. Fourteen head-to-head comparisons, each with a section on what the other tool does better. Several of them end by telling you to stay where you are.

How does mrkr compare to other analytics tools?

mrkr is privacy-first web analytics with session replay, funnels, and revenue attribution in one tool, cookieless by default with an optional cookie mode per site. It has no heatmaps and no surveys. Against simple tools it is deeper. Against platforms it is narrower and lighter.

Every page below is built from one checked competitor data file, so the numbers cannot drift between pages, and each table shows the date it was checked. Where a vendor does not publish a fixed price, the table says how they charge rather than inventing a figure.

Every competitor, in one table. The whole field on the four questions that decide most evaluations: what it costs to start, whether it needs a consent banner, whether it records sessions, and whether it has heatmaps. mrkr is in the table, not above it.

ToolFromBanner?ReplayHeatmaps
Google Analytics 4FreeDepends on configurationNoNo
Hotjar$32/moYesYesYes
Microsoft ClarityFreeYesYesYes
Plausible$9/moNoNoNo
Matomo Cloud~EUR 19/moDepends on configurationYesYes
Fathom$15/moNoNoNo
MixpanelEvent-volume pricingYesYesNo
PostHogUsage-basedDepends on configurationYesYes
AmplitudeEvent-volume pricingYesYesNo
FullStoryQuoted by salesYesYesYes
LogRocketSession-volume pricingYesYesIn its product-analytics module
UmamiVariesNoNoNo
Simple AnalyticsEUR 20/moNoNoNo
Pirsch$6/moNoNoNo
mrkr$1 for 14 days, then from $5/moNo, in the default cookieless modeYesNo

Every vendor in this table details checked against the vendor's own pricing and feature pages on 2026-08-24. Where a vendor does not publish a fixed list price, this table says how they charge rather than guessing a number. Vendors change packaging often, so confirm before you buy.

Skip the reading. The live demo is the whole product on a populated dataset. Two minutes there settles most of what these pages argue about.

Open the live demo
The mrkr dashboard showing visitors, sources, and revenue.
Do these comparisons say where mrkr loses?

Yes, every one of them has a section naming what the other tool does better, and several recommend staying where you are. mrkr has no heatmaps and no on-site surveys, and in cookieless mode it cannot follow a visitor across days. Those limits appear on every relevant page.

Which comparison should I read first?

Whichever tool you are already paying for. If you are choosing from scratch, the Google Analytics and Plausible pages cover the two most common starting points, and the roundups under Alternatives review whole fields at once.

How current are the competitor facts?

Every figure comes from one checked data file with a date on it, shown at the bottom of each comparison table. Where a vendor does not publish a fixed list price, the table says how they charge rather than guessing a number.

Does mrkr need a cookie banner?

Not in its default mode, which sets no cookie and uses no fingerprint. Cookie mode is an optional per-site setting for teams who want cross-session identity, and turning it on brings consent obligations.

What does mrkr not do at all?

No heatmaps, no on-site surveys, no feature flags, no A/B experiments, no error tracking, and no native mobile SDKs. Those are permanent gaps rather than a roadmap.

Start with one line of HTML.Your first visitors show up within a minute.